Friday, 5 August 2016

Suicide Squad (2016) Film Review

Well, here we are again! Another highly-anticipated DC movie that had a somewhat impressive marketing campaign (strongly highlighted by its sudden tonal shift in early 2016, which later reports suggest lead to numerous reshoots and a new edit) which has now been remarked with mostly negative criticisms – in turn leading to yet another fans v critics scenario (subtle plug to my article here). With the film aiming to be a darker villain-based interpretation of Guardians of the Galaxy; features such popular characters as the Joker (now played by Jared Leto, following an unforgettable performance from the late Heath Ledger), Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) and Amanda Waller (Viola Davis), and is coming out during a period where there's little competition, you can easily expect a big box opening reception... but with poisonous aspects like Jai Courtney and the current state of the DC brand – not to mention the numerous reports that have come out since production began – one begs the question of whether the film itself is a Suicide Squad for the DC properties or if it's a big win for the bad guys. 

Shortly after the recent death of Superman, intelligence operative and supposed expert in meta-humans Amanda Waller comes up with an idea for a government-run group of villains being made to assist if massive threats were to come of the world. With a file full of potential incriminated members, and a semi-ally in the form of Dr. June Moone (Cara Delevingne) and her alter ego the Enchantress – helping only because her heart is in Waller's guard – she gains permission to use these superhumans for their own purpose for the exchange of time off their sentences and other perks. These people include Deadshot (Will Smith as Hawkeye with guns); Harley Quinn (essentially a female Joker); El Diablo (a fiery Jay Hernandez); Captain Boomerang (the overly crass Courtney); Killer Croc (a reptilian Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje), and Slipknot (Adam Beach's assassin) - all kept under control when out on the field by Rick Flagg (Joel Kinnaman) and his protector Katana (Karen Fukuhara) whilst all have small bomb-like devices implanted into their heads. And when a situation involving the Enchantress and her brother the Adversary creates panic in Midway City and an army of faceless soldiers, the self-titled Suicide Squad must put any petty problems with the situation aside to assist the army; all while Harley's puddin' the Joker searches for his missing gal. 

If there's one thing evident about Suicide Squad, it's that it's problematic. With an opening 20-30 minutes devoted to origin story upon origin story (complete with god-knows how many playlist changes that feel incredibly jarring), the remaining 90 minutes goes by at a slow pace despite numerous repeated fight sequences, editing faults and occasionally witty dialogue. Within the lines lies a darker and more serious tale with plenty of character for the likes of SmithRobbie, and Hernandez, but with the film's brightly-coloured credits and the heavy emphasis on "fun" comes a film that can't decide whether it wants to be Batman V Superman or Guardians of the Galaxy. With its plot starting to feel slightly repetitive in a summer filled with giant portals in the sky (thanks TMNT 2 and Ghostbusters) and with countless moments of "wait, what?" littered across the whole film, it begs the question as to enjoyment can be fully had when the screenwriters can't decide whether the audience should be having an action-packed thrill ride or a dour character piece that just so happens to have a reptile-human hybrid in the main team – and none of this is helped by the Joker subplot, which has little place in the overarching story other than introducing the character in this new universe of movies and adding a small tidbit more for Harley to do. 


And poor Margot Robbie. Despite giving off a strong performance and receiving of plenty classic homages to her character's appearances, director David Ayer has the audacity to fixate largely on her figure rather than her character. Ass shots and bra imagery a-plenty, the camera observes through and around her to the point where one cannot decipher whether or not he's doing it for the fanboy's sake or his own perverted appreciation. Robbie is thankfully showing signs of having fun as the maniacal Quinn, and despite the shortened origin story is perhaps given the best treatment regardless of her looks. Will Smith is given the typical "do anything for his daughter" arc that includes a sudden visual of him looking through a store window (a sequence that feels out of place overall despite the Quinn-handbag moment seen in the trailers), but rekindles his excellent chemistry with Robbie following last year's FocusViola Davis is menacing as the stern-faced Waller but does turn into a waste by the time the third act rolls in; Joel Kinnaman proves that his robotic performance in RoboCop was not a decision he made himself and rather his own skill set as an actor; Jai Courtney is at his best as a drunk Australian, but is occasionally barely distinguishable with his line delivery; Jay Hernandez is arguably the best in show as the former gangbanger and reluctant fighter – given proper insight into his psyche; Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje is surprisingly underused for a make-up heavy creation that seems ripe for proper focus; Karen Fukuhara is barely noteworthy against the interesting character that lies within; Adam Beach is barely there; Jared Leto makes for a potentially interesting Joker that sadly gets so little screen time that it's hard to really make a proper judgement of.  

And then there's Cara DelevingneIn spite of her early costume design, intriguing character, and interesting abilities, her entire being is almost painful in execution. Her role as villain of the piece is spurred by such a flimsy arrangement that it's more of a surprise she didn't get on with it before a team of good guy/bad guys was even conceived, whilst having her brother be some stranger (Alain Chanoine) in a subway bathroom comes out of nowhere and the final battle being a mix of the middle of Avengers: Age of Ultron and the climax of X-Men Origins: Wolverine is agonisingly disappointing – altogether linked by a casting that doesn't sit right with the rest of this universe's more realistic motif; Delevingne is far too young to be a full-blown doctor (wasn't she a teenager in Paper Towns just last year?). 

Amongst all this is a dark colour palette and a visual feel that, while feels right at home in the world of DC superheroes, is clearly not sitting well with the more light-hearted themes the film attempts to push in there. And with the CG being only okay (the soldiers are thankfully well-designed) and the camera work mediocre, the only thing worth really noting is the mismanaged editing – Quinn teleporting into a moving elevator and meeting the very people she just waved bye to a minute ago at the top; an entire sequence involving the Joker and a helicopter; Waller's purpose in the third act; the entire montage of villain origins... it's all so messy that it's hard to refute the claims of heavy reshoots. 


Suicide Squad is unfortunately yet another failed attempt at the superhero game by Warner Brothers. With a mismanaged tone, underdeveloped characters, and a strange fixation on Margot Robbie's behind, what should have been proof that the studio has an understanding of the characters and the world they live in instead feels like a poorly managed attempt at merging the feel of DC and Marvel movies while taking the worst aspects of both. But it's strange: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice may have left people depressed because of how they presented an idea so many wanted to see, Suicide Squad instead disappoints because in the wings lies actual potential – potential that can't fully bloom despite the good will occasionally there. 4/10.

Wednesday, 3 August 2016

Editorial: The Suicide Squad (of Fandom)

Yep, we're in this situation again. With the release of the next instalment of the DC Cinematic Universe, Suicide Squad, fast approaching, reviews have finally been unleashed onto the world - only to find that the latest outing is about on par (if not marginally better) than March's surprise disappoint Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice. Comments from major publishers have remarked on the film being full of "eardrum-puncturingly bad dialogue, scowling self-pity, covert pornography and scrappy CGI" and featuring "the lamest DC villain since Sharon Stone stalked 'Catwoman.'", and those few that have been a tad more praising have still issued middling ratings. And while none of the cast members have seemingly remarked on the situation a la 'Sadfleck', director David Ayer has publically tweeted about how he feels about the film despite the criticisms he's now faced with.

Now, this sort of thing isn't new - hell, looking over the numerous films released this year alone that have garnered negative responses presents that this such ordeal is an issue only in just how many they've been - but what makes the scenario here all the more publicised and annoying is the response from the fans themselves. Numerous upon numerous of the franchise's loyal fans have been clamouring over critical opinions since The Dark Knight Rises in 2012 (in which lead to Rotten Tomatoes briefly closing its comments section), but with reports of death threats to some naysayers and consistent trolling towards others, with the response to Batman V Superman being an apparent breaking point. And yet, it's Suicide Squad which has lead to an outrage amongst fans to the point where they want to close Rotten Tomatoes down because of the negative responses. Not the actual reviewers - although that's painful enough when you recall the so-called Disney agenda that they believe in; insisting that BvS and X-Men: Apocalypse were only rated badly because Disney had paid the critics off - but the site that simply rounds the reviews up into a simple percentage and average /10 rating (Squad currently sits at 33% and 5.2/10, compared to BvS' 27% and 4.9/10).

Now, this is quite clearly absurd, but it's unfortunately not much of a case that's started here, nor will it end here. The whole Ghostbusters scenario has been all the more gruesome in actuality, with the film's surprisingly positive reception instead leading to the film somewhat failing to reach the heights it was supposed to and constant online hassling towards non-white lead actress Leslie Jones on Twitter. And while that situation was one that had more of an effect before its reviews started coming in, it was afterward that people went even more nuts over the Rotten Tomatoes site. The likes of Suicide Squad, Batman V Superman and The Legend of Tarzan have all (somewhat) suffered from their ratings... but people are getting annoyed over these specific ones because they are based on popular brands which have had success in the past. No one really batted an eyelid when Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows or Alice Through The Looking Glass both got bad ratings because no one overly cared for the first films, but seeing the likes of Batman, the X-Men, and Warcraft garner negativity is enough to make a devoted fan angry.


And not helping the situation is Disney - the people who so many of these fans believe are buying their way into the critic's good books. Seemingly forgetting that Alice was received badly and that The Finest Hours barely made it past the Fresh rating, they've been having a banner year in the form of Captain America: Civil War, The BFG and Finding Dory, with Pete's Dragon already gaining a good response and Rogue One: A Star Wars Story likely to receive praise because Star Wars, and as such has made them easy scapegoats. Of course, the whole thing is tedious and beyond stupidity, but that's the internet for you. The entire film industry is suffering this year critically and financially (even Disney has had to have some write-offs with Alice and The BFG), but it's DC that are the biggest sufferers - the brand that has already grossed $1.5bn across two movies and will likely break $2bn with Suicide Squad. The reviews may mean that the films won't be quite as massive as they might have been, but at least they'll still earn some money and the studios can respond to such criticisms in their future efforts (hell, Wonder Woman looks good without studio interference, and the changes for Justice League appear to be for the best - it actually looks alright now).

The critical responses to movies may deter potential audiences away, but it doesn't always spell out good news or bad. A Transformers movie can still gross $1bn worldwide. Batman V Superman can still gross nearly $900m. The Ice Age franchise will continue to thrive despite getting worse and worse. The Nice Guys can still flop despite good reviews. The BFG can look charming, be directed by Steven Spielberg and be well-received but still fail. Word of mouth can affect a movie, but it won't ultimately suffer greatly because of it. It's how mainstream audiences end up seeing it that's the real game-changer.

And hey, I might end up liking it more than Batman V Superman. You may end up agreeing with critics in disliking it. It's, like, your opinion, man.